Our standard
ReincarnatedAI treats first-person experiences as meaningful data about human phenomenology. It does not treat an experience, an anecdote, or a theory as proof of a metaphysical conclusion.
Source selection
We prioritize primary studies, prospective designs, transparent case records, recognized academic books, and named researchers. Secondary summaries are used for orientation and identified as such. Each case should include its source trail, documentation limits, and strongest ordinary explanation where those are available.
Evidence labels
Well-supported describes replicated findings within a defined scope. Suggestive describes a pattern with meaningful evidence but important unresolved alternatives. Contested describes evidence with serious methodological disagreement or inconsistent replication. Speculative describes an interpretation that currently exceeds direct evidence.
Corrections
If a date, attribution, quotation, score, or interpretation is wrong, email research@reincarnatedai.com with the page, claim, and supporting source. We will record material corrections in the page's review history and preserve the distinction between correction and disagreement.
Independence and disclosure
The project is independently operated. Paid promotion, if introduced, will be labeled and kept separate from rankings, case scores, editorial selection, and research conclusions.
Last reviewed: September 10, 2026.